Othello is Solely Responsible for his Downfall in...

I believe Iago has nothing to do with Othellos downfall as Othello is an easily mislead man who is easily influenced. Not only did Iago not directly say Desdemona was having an affair, he neither didn’t give proof to confirm the rumours. By Othello believing the lies, it surfaces his inability to trust and have faith in his own wife. Othello is written by William Shakespeare and was set in Cyprus and Venice during the 16th century. It is about a well-respected military soldier who due to lies and deceits killed his wife for no reason and after turned the knife towards himself. The play illustrates how much one could be polluted in such little time; with the ‘facts’ based upon suspicions and assumptions from a source who was determined to†¦show more content†¦But we can’t make a final judgement as his true characteristics have not yet surfaced. We learn through Iago that Othello is a terrible man as he supposedly stole Brabantio’s innocent da ughter, Desdemona, and married her during the night; with the use of witchcraft and black magic to posses her into marrying him as Brabantio says; ‘O thou foul thief, where hast thou stowed my daughter? Damned as thou art, thou hast enchanted her!’ We learn Othello through Iago that he is an easy target to manipulate because he is so open: ‘And will as tenderly be led by th’ nose As asses are.’ Othello can be lead into anything just because he believes everybody is a good honest person. In some cases, like Iago’s, this is a bad thing as he can be fooled easily by false assumptions. He also says he is an open and a straightforward person. â€Å"The Moor is of free and open nature That thinks men honest that but seem to be so†¦Ã¢â‚¬  He is approachable and straight forward man who supposedly has favourites, unfair, and always and must have his own way. We soon find out that this is false by the way Othello presents himself in front of the duke. By Othello obtaining these characteristics, he can be easily fooled and persuaded, which Iago acts upon. We find out Othello is a soldier. Being a soldier, you will also acquire the nature such as always shouting, commanding and bad mannered. We find out that Othello is exactly theShow MoreRelatedOthello, By William Shakespeare893 Words   |  4 PagesShakespeare’s ‘Othello’ is a play that ends tragically with death of the antagonist, Othello who commits suicide after smothering his wife to death. The other tragic death is Lago’s murder of Roderigo. Lago, who may be considered as the villain of the play, is in a way responsible for all the tragic deaths in the play. He is a schemer who is able to conceal his moves and is considered an honest per son by almost every character in the play until the end of the play when it is discovered that he isRead MoreHis Moorships Ancient: Iago as the Protagonist of Othello1658 Words   |  7 Pagesrevered for his characterization of flawed and psychologically unstable protagonists. Hamlet is a crazed, murdering prince, Lear is narcissistic, senile, and a verbally abusive father, and Macbeth is a murderous traitor to his king and country. These unfavorable and evil attributes serve Shakespeares main characters by presenting them as realistically written men, and there always seems a degree, however small, of sympathy associated with their respective downfalls and tragedies. Othello, however,Read Moreâ€Å"Aristotle’s Definition of the Tragic Hero and Irony in Tragedy† Oedipus Rex, Othello, and Death of a Salesman3217 Words   |  13 PagesAristotelian theory which leads us to his definition of the tragic hero. Aristotle’s conceptualization of tragedy and all that it encompasses is widely revered and accepted; setting the standard previously and contemporaneously. The interpretation of his definition of tragedy is ambiguous, but generally states that tragedy should evoke pity and fear within the viewer for the purpose of catharsis, or purgation of senses sequencing the climax of a tragedy. (Battin) This elicits his definition of the tragic hero

The Relationship Between Policy, Statutes, and Regulations in Environmental Law Free Essays

Environmental policy is the official stance or statement by a government or organization which provides a framework for its environmental objectives. (C2E2. org, 2011)The US Government Environmental policy is contained in the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA). We will write a custom essay sample on The Relationship Between Policy, Statutes, and Regulations in Environmental Law or any similar topic only for you Order Now Congress declared under section 4331(a) of NEPA that it is â€Å"the continuing policy of the federal government†¦ to create and maintain conditions under which man and nature can exist in productive harmony, and to fulfill the social, economic, and other requirements of present and future generations of Americans. (U. S. Congress, 1969) Environmental statutes are the written will or act of the legislature with regard to expressing the stated environmental policy. (Lectric Law Library, 2011) NEPA functions in this capacity by enabling the EPA to promulgate regulations in order to set forth guidelines by which other agencies must comply in order to satisfy the intent of NEPA. Environmental regulations act as the forcing mechanism with which to gain compliance with the statute as set forth under the policy. Continuing to use NEPA as an example, the US Government environmental policy is contained in NEPA (the statute) which prescribes regulations that aim at protecting the environment. Most noteably, the EPA issued regulations regarding Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) and Environmental Assessments (AE) assess the possible environmental impacts of proposed government projects and there alternatives – and are required from all federal agencies. (US EPA, 2011) How to cite The Relationship Between Policy, Statutes, and Regulations in Environmental Law, Papers

The Brilliance in “Blue-Collar Brilliance” free essay sample

As a whole, society sometimes makes many preconceived notions about people, groups and their actions or life choices. These accusations are wrong. Author Mike Rose reiterates this point in his article â€Å"Blue-Collar Brilliance† saying, â€Å"If we think that whole categories of people-identified by class or occupation-are not that bright, then we reinforce social separations and cripple our ability to talk across cultural divides. †(Pg254), he’s essentially saying if we as a society think that making social divides is acceptable then we only separate the classes more. Mike Rose begins his article with two short stories to give a base to his argument that he will soon present. The first is about his mother Rosie who used cognitive problem solving and many other skills on the job as a waitress at a local diner. In the second, he tells us about his uncle Joe who moves up in the ranks of the General Motors Company from working the assembly line to being a supervisor. We will write a custom essay sample on The Brilliance in â€Å"Blue-Collar Brilliance† or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page In both accounts Mike Rose tells about how; even though working in the blue-collar profession, his family members used their past experience and current problems to provide themselves with a â€Å"kind of rhetorical education†(Pg249). Rose then gets back on track with his thesis idea, and takes a stab at society. His following argument leaves us with many questions. Why do we create the social biases that we do? Many people state that â€Å"we don’t know a man until we’ve walked a mile in his shoes†, but do we practice what we preach? Mike Rose tries to answer this by saying, â€Å"Our Culture†¦separates the body from the mind, so that, for example, we assume that the use of a tool does not involve abstraction. †(Pg250). So is it because an occupation incorporates hard labor do we pass it off as being a lesser of mental challenge? Working in a blue-collar profession requires so much more mental concentration then anyone gives it credit for. Mike Rose gives many examples as to how this idea is true. We as society think that you go into work, punch a time card, do a simple; sometimes repetitive, task for hours, punch a time card out and carry on with a boring meek life. There is so much that lies at the core of hard labor that we overlook. Whether it is a monotonous action that is involved, many people find ways to make it easier, do it faster, or create a safer product. Mike tells us how his mother Rosie working in the diner, would make psychological distinctions between each of her customers to better improve the efficiency of her work, thus, sometimes resulting in a greater tip. Mike Rose gives us these stories’, which present us with questions that gives us our own argument, which he then tries to compete with his own argument. Rosie and Uncle Joe, are both somewhat an image of the true core of blue-collar work. Mike says it himself â€Å"To acknowledge a broader range of intellectual capacity is to take seriously the concept of cognitive variability, to appreciate in all the Rosies and Joes†¦Ã¢â‚¬ (Pg254) If it wasn’t for the true brilliance shown in the many blue-collar professions or the ideas from that of a blue-collar professional, would we be where we are today? Because much of society would agree, that today is a cleaner, safer, much more efficient world than that of even 20 years ago, largely due to the contributions and actions of the blue-collar workforce. Lastly, if we continue to â€Å"reinforce social separations†(Pg254), do our actions make us more mentally competent than the thought we have of blue-collar professionals’? Or are we simply doing as Mike Rose said we would, and â€Å"reinforcing social separations†? That is the true question here. Gerald Graff, Cathy Birkenstein, Russel Durst, Mike Rose. â€Å"Blue-Collar Brilliance† They say I say 2E (2012) 243-255 Print. â€Å"Blue-Collar Brilliance: Questions Assumptions about Intelligence, Work and Social Class† Reprinted from The American Scholar, Volume 78, No. 3, summer 2009. Copyright 2009 Mike Rose.